Digital preservation is
the process of safekeeping of digitally stored information for the benefit of
present and future generation. Last two decades have witnessed that libraries
have transitioned from acquiring paper-based collections to subscribing access
to web-based e-content. This shift from owning print collections to renting
digital collection has had several disturbing unintended consequences and has
put libraries in a precarious and weakened position. Since digital information
is more prone to damage and loss than print information, therefore, it is
imperative to include the practices required to ensure their safety from medium
failures as well as software and hardware obsolescence.
Various initiatives and
policies are currently in place to ensure the long term preservation of digital
information. Some of the preservation projects to be mentioned here are:
Classic
Software Preservation Project (CLASP): CLASP project was setup
by the Internet Archive in 2004 with the aim of collecting and archiving
obsolete retail software in outdated formats dating from 1970s to early 1990s.
These consumer software are archived until copyright obstacles are overcome and
then refreshed the data into current suitable storage media and made them
freely available.
Digital
Object Management System (DORIA): DORIA is a national
project of Finland set up by Helsinki University Library to collect and
preserve digital collections held by the universities and polytechnics of
Finland.
PANDORA
Digital Archiving System (PANDAS): PANDAS has been developed
as a web-based tool by the National Library of Australia since 2001 to provide
an integrated, web-based, web archiving management system.
KB e-Depot: Koninklijke Bibliotheek (KB), National Library of the Netherlands started a project of digital Information Archiving System ‘e-Depot’ in 2002 for long term preservation of digital publications in the country.
KB e-Depot: Koninklijke Bibliotheek (KB), National Library of the Netherlands started a project of digital Information Archiving System ‘e-Depot’ in 2002 for long term preservation of digital publications in the country.
The
Effective Strategic model for the Preservation and Disposal of Institutional Assets
(ESPIDA): The project was based in the University of Glasgow
and sponsored by the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) to draw up a
model for digital preservation at higher education institutions.
LOCKSS, CLOCKSS, and
PORTICO are the three major digital preservation initiatives aimed at
protecting and preserving the digital content for its long term access and use.
LOCKSS (Lots of Copies Keep Stuff Safe) program, founded in 1999 by Dr.
David S.H. Rosenthal and Victoria Reich under the sponsorship of Stanford
University, develops and supports open source software for digital
preservation. The LOCKSS program provides access to
archived information even in case of temporary loss of access to publisher or
publishers’ website or preserves the data for longer period. Librarians use their local LOCKSS
box as a ‘digital stacks’ to store and take custody of subscribed and open
access e-content, bringing the traditional purchase-and-own model to electronic
materials as well and strengthening the role of libraries in the digital era.
The program, led and supported by
libraries and librarians internationally, works on the
principles and practices like replication, format migration and repair through
a polling mechanism. When LOCKSS is installed on a system, it becomes part of a
large LOCKSS network comprising thousands of nodes and each node connected to
network share information as a result of which multiple copies of information
get produced at different geographical locations. LOCKSS has a unique polling
and repair mechanism. For example, if particular information on a node gets
deleted or reports a difference in comparison to other nodes, it is
automatically polled out odd in the network and the deleted information is
replaced or the difference found is neutralized thereby ensuring the security
of preserved data. LOCKSS also includes
the feature of format migration i.e. it provides facility for automatic data
migration from invalid format to usable or current format.
Though LOCKSS is open
and free software, its members have to join an alliance called LOCKSS Alliance and support it
financially for development and documentation of the core LOCKSS technologies.
CLOCKSS
(Controlled Lots of Copies Keep Stuff Safe) is an extended
version of LOCKSS, founded as a project in 2006 is a collaboration of world’s
leading academic publishers and research libraries, providing sustainable dark
archive to ensure the long term survival of web-based scholarly content.
Digital content is stored in the CLOCKSS archive with no user access unless a
‘trigger’ situation occurs. It works on the same principle of
replication and polling odd one out mechanism as in the case of LOCKSS but
unlike LOCKSS (a light archive) it is a dark archive, which ensures access to
information in trigger situations only.
Trigger
event mainly occurs due to following reasons:
|
PORTICO
digital preservation service, started in 2002 as a project by JSTOR, is
now a part of ITHAKA, a not-for-profit organization helping the academic
community use digital technologies to preserve the scholarly content (e-journals,
e-books, digitized collections) accessible to researchers, scholars, and
students in the future. It was launched in 2005.
Comparison of LOCKSS, CLOCKSS and
Portico Accessibility
Difference between LOCKSS, CLOCKSS and PORTICO
Conditions for Trigger event
|
|||
LOCKSS
|
CLOCKSS
|
PORTICO
|
|
When
library cancels subscription with publishers and needs access to back issues
to which they had subscription
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes,
but if library discontinues Portico participation, then they will no longer
be able to get post-cancellation access to content through Portico.
|
E-Journal
and its past issues are no longer available from the publisher
|
Yes
|
Yes,
but the title would be openly made accessible to all
|
Yes,
the title would be made accessible to all active participants without
considering whether they were previously subscribing the content or not
|
When
publisher ceased operation and e-content is no longer available
|
Yes
|
Yes,
but the title would be openly made accessible to all
|
Yes,
the title would be made accessible to all active participants without
considering whether they were previously subscribing the content or not
|
Natural
disasters/Catastrophic failure
|
Yes
|
Yes,
but on condition if the publisher is unable to provide service due to the
said reason
|
Yes,
but on condition if the publisher is unable to provide service due to the
said reason
|
Temporary
failure of publisher’s operation/servers
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
Difference between LOCKSS, CLOCKSS and PORTICO
LOCKSS is a real time backup solution. It provides
access to stored content whenever publisher sites are unavailable, even for a
brief period of downtime. Portico and CLOCKSS are dark archive, preserving
digital content for the long term. Access to CLOCKSS content is similar to the
Portico model. The difference between Portico and CLOCKSS is that Portico
archives digital content in Standard format, whereas CLOCKSS preserves content
in the publisher's original format (not a standard archival format).
System
Approaches of LOCKSS, CLOCKSS & PORTICO
LOCKSS
|
CLOCKSS
|
PORTICO
|
Open
source software
|
Open
source software
|
Proprietary
software
|
Distributed,
peer to peer platform with error detection
|
Distributed,
peer to peer platform with error detection
|
Centralized,
hosted platform
|
Small
workstation required, it can be run of a CD
|
Specific
server hardware required
|
No
equipment required from client side
|
Light
archive (even for short term preservation)
|
Dark
archive (long term preservation)
|
Dark
archive (long term preservation)
|
Preserves
content in publisher's original format
|
Preserves
content in publisher's original format
|
Use
standard format for preservation
|
SELF CHECK EXERCISES
1.
LOCKSS
program is related to ___.
A. Computer virus
B. Institutional repository
C. Long term digital preservation
D. Programming language
2.
Portico
digital preservation service is part of __.
A. Elsevier
B. McGraw-Hill
C. ITHAKA
D. EBSCO
3.
KB
e-Depot is a digital information preservation system of __.
A. France
B. England
C. Netherlands
D. Australia
4.
Which
among the following system is considered ‘a light archive’?
A. Portico
B. LOCKSS
C. CLOCKSS
D. None of the above
5.
Select
the correct combinations:
a) Portico – Preserves scholarly
publications in dark archives
b) LOCKSS – Non-profit service that
allows libraries to collect e-contents for digital preservation
c) CLOCKSS – Non-profit digital
preservation service for participating libraries
d) DORIA – National preservation
project of Finland
A. c, and d are correct
B. a, and c are correct
C. b and c are correct
D. a, b, c, and d are correct
6.
Select
the correct combinations:
a) DORIA – Helsinki University
Library
b) LOCKSS – Stanford University
Libraries
c) ESPIDA – University of Glassgow
d) PANDAS – National Library of
Australia
A. c, and d are correct
B. a, and c are correct
C. b and c are correct
D. a, b, c, and d are correct
17 Comments
Good work sir
ReplyDeleteThanks...stay connected for many more
DeleteVery knowledgefull
ReplyDeleteThanks...stay connected for many more
DeleteThanks for response. pls post more such type of topics.
ReplyDeletesure...will do that definitely
DeleteGreat information sir..than you and waiting for many more.
DeleteThanks...stay connected!!
DeleteGreat and useful notes sir
ReplyDeleteThanks....stay tuned for many more..
DeleteYour notes are really so good and very helpful ...post notes for other topics also ...
ReplyDeleteThanks...definitely will do the needful for sure
DeleteSir pls provide the answers also
ReplyDeleteAll the answers are covered in the notes....please study the notes carefully
DeleteIt's very important for net exam. .1 questions put up every time
ReplyDeleteYes, exactly, all the notes are prepared keeping in mind the UGC-Net and other exams' pattern
DeleteThank you very informative
ReplyDelete