
The primary distinction between RDA and AACR is structural. While AACR-2 was based on ISBD, RDA is built on FRBR (1998) and FRAD (2009) conceptual models, making it more useful for resource description as a cataloging code for the modern libraries operating in a digital environment. The metadata descriptions created by using the instructions of RDA are well formed according to International standards for user-centered linked data applications that make it compatible with any coding schema including existing records created by following AACR2 rules and other new and emerging database structures. In addition, it provides more scope for cataloging non-printed text resources, non-text resources and unpublished resources.
Replacement of GMD
elements in RDA: A major change with RDA was the change from the
General Material Designation (GMD) to the content, media, and carrier types
(CMCs) provided in MARC 336, 337, and 338 (commonly referred to as 33X) fields.
The AACR2 GMD is now replaced by the following three elements in
RDA:
- Content type (RDA 6.9, an RDA core element for the expression) in new MARC field 336
- Media type (RDA 3.2, an LC core element for the manifestation)
in new MARC field 337
- Carrier type (RDA 3.3, an RDA core element for the
manifestation) in new MARC field 338
RDA vocabularies for Content, Media, and Carrier type were developed jointly by Joint Steering Committee in conjunction with publishing community (ONIX).
FRBR & FRAD
|
Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records
(FRBR) is a conceptual entity-relationship model
developed by IFLA which was first published in print in 1998 by K.G. Saur. FRBR
comprises 3 groups of entities:
Group 1 entities are work, expression,
manifestation, and item (WEMI). They represent the products of
intellectual or artistic endeavor.
Group 2 entities are person, family and
corporate body (PFC), responsible for the custodianship of Group 1’s
intellectual or artistic endeavor.
Group 3 entities are subjects of Group 1 or Group
2’s intellectual endeavor, and include concepts, objects, events, places.
Functional Requirements for Authority Data (FRAD)
developed and approved by IFLA in 2009 is also a conceptual
entity-relationship model which helps in facilitating and sharing data by relating
the library authority records to the needs of the users of those
records.
|
FRBR/FRAD
User Tasks
|
FRBR four user tasks are: Find, Identify,
Select and Obtain.
The four user tasks identified under FRAD are: Find,
Identify, Contextualize, and Justify.
|
RDA Steering Committee responsible for the maintenance of RDA is composed of representatives from 7 cataloguing communities: ALA, British Library, Canadian Committee on Cataloguing, Australian Committee on Cataloguing, CILIP, Deutsche National bibliothek, and the Library of Congress.
What
is LC-PCC PS?
|
LC-PCC-PS
stands for ‘Library of Congress-Program for Cooperative Cataloging Policy
Statements’ which came into existence with the collaboration of LC
(Library of Congress) and PCC (Program for Cooperative Cataloguing) deciding
to adopt a single set of policy statements in October 2012. They have created
this extensive body of Library of Congress Policy Statements (LCPS) to
facilitate a standard interpretation and application of alternatives, options
and exceptions to RDA instructions and guidelines. Current Library of
Congress-Program for Cooperative Cataloging Policy Statements (LC-PCC PSs)
are freely available as part of the RDA Toolkit.
|
The text of RDA consists of 10 sections divided into 37 chapters, with 13 appendices, a glossary, and an index. The 10 sections of RDA are as follows:
- Section 1: Recording Attributes of Manifestation & Item;
- Section 2: Recording Attributes of Work & Expression;
- Section 3: Recording Attributes of Person, Family, & Corporate Body;
- Section 4: Recording Attributes of Concept, Object, Event & Place;
- Section 5: Recording Primary Relationships between Work, Expression, Manifestation, & Item;
- Section 6: Recording Relationships to Persons, Families, & Corporate Bodies;
- Section 7: Recording Relationships to Concepts, Objects, Events, & Places;
- Section 8: Recording Relationships between Works, Expressions, Manifestations, & Items;
- Section 9: Recording Relationships between Persons, Families, & Corporate Bodies;
- Section 10: Recording Relationships between Concepts, Objects, Events, & Places
Answer: (B)
Answer: (A)
Answer: (A)
Answe: (A)
Answe: (D)
Answe: (B)
Answe: (C)
0 Comments